Designation of the Marks of Quality

Organoleptic Character
  • Visual aspect
  • Nose : Intensity
  • Nose : Quality
  • Taste and retronasal sensations : Intensity
  • Taste and retronasal sensations : Quality
  • General impression, harmony
A scale of evaluation for each organoleptic character
  • Excellent (0 point of penalty)
  • Very Good (1 point of penalty)
  • Good (2 point of penalty)
  • Inadequate (4 point of penalty)
  • Eliminated (Eliminated)
Transcription and calculation of the results
Still Wines
Sparkling Wines
Visual Aspect
-
x1
Foam
-
x2
Limpidity
x1
-
Noze Intensity
x1
x1
Quality
x2
x2
Taste Effervescence
-
x2
Intensity
x2
x2
Quality
x3
x3
Harmony
x3
x3

Each sample receives a rating which is the median rating based on the ratings resulting from the calculation of the evaluation of each of the jurors.

When there is an odd number of jurors, the median is immediately evident. If the number happens to be even, the median is based on the average of the closest two ratings in the middle of the ratings.

Conferring the Awards
Awards
Still Wines
Sparkling Wines
Grand Gold Medal
0 - 3
0 - 5
Gold Medal
4 - 8
6 - 13
Silver Medal
9 - 14
14 - 21
Bonze Medal
15 - 21
22 - 30
  • The sum of all medals must not exceed 33.33% of participating wines.
  • The samples that obtained the least good results are eliminated.